Keywords
public expenditure
sustainable development
environmental protection
How to Cite
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of public debt levels on public environmental protection expenditures. The underlying hypothesis suggests that the level of public debt influences the amount of public spending allocated to environmental protection. The methodology is based on a panel data regression analysis for the yearly observations from 1995 to 2022 on all EU economies. Data were collected from the Eurostat database. The results are contextualised within the broader framework of sustainable development and legal regulations, which promote higher environmental protection expenditures. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on the efficiency of environmental protection expenditure, exploring the tension between fiscal responsibility and the need for greater investment in environmental sustainability.
References
Adelaja, A. O., Hailu, Y. G., & Tekle, A. T. (2008). The Political Economy of State The Political Economy of State Conservation and Conservation and Conservation and Environmental Environmental Protection Protection Spending in the US in the US in the US. Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Restoration, 5(1), 113-123. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250362011_The_political_economy_of_state_conservation_spending_-_the_case_of_Michigan
Afshan, S., Yaqoob, T., Ho, W. K., & Leong, K. Y. (2024). Achieving sustainable growth in emerging economies: Insights from advanced method moment of quantile regression. Gondwana Research, 127, 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.08.003
Auteri, M., Mele, M., Ruble, I., & Magazzino, C. (2024). The double sustainability: The link between government debt and renewable energy. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 29, e00356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2024.e00356.
Bacchiocchi, E., Borghi, E., & Missale, A. (2011). Public investment under fiscal constraints. Fiscal Studies, 32(1), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2011.00126.x.
Boly, M., Combes, J. L., & Motel, P. (2023). Does environment pay for politicians? Economic Modelling, 128, 106491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106491
Boly, M., Combes, J.-L., Menuet, M., Minea, A., Combes Motel, P., & Villieu, P. (2022). Can public debt mitigate environmental debt? Theory and empirical evidence. Energy Economics, 111, 105895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105895.
Carnazza, G., Renström, T., & Spataro, L. (2023). Is public debt environmentally friendly? The role of EU fiscal rules on environmental quality: An empirical assessment. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Papers. Paper, 1428. https://services.bepress.com/feem/paper1428
Chu, W. W. L., Vicidomini, M., Calise, F., Duić, N., Østergaard, P. A., Wang, Q., & da Graca Carvalho, M. (2022). Recent advances in technologies, methods, and economic analysis for sustainable development of energy, water, and environment systems. Energies, 15(19), 7129. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197129.
Dańska-Borsiak, B. (2011). Dynamiczne modele panelowe w badaniach ekonomicznych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. (in Polish).
Davin, M., Fodha, M., & Seegmuller, T. (2024). Pollution, public debt, and growth: The question of sustainability. https://hal.science/hal-04620026/document
D'Orazio, P. (2025). Addressing climate risks through fiscal policy in emerging and developing economies: What do we know and what lies ahead? Energy Research & Social Science, 119, 103852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103852
Dugarova, E., & Gülasan, N. (2017). Global Trends. Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.undp.org/publications/global-trends-challenges-and-opportunities-implementation-sdgs
Fodha, M., & Seegmuller, T. (2012). A Note on Environmental Policy and Public Debt Stabilization. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 16, 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100510000672
Fodha, M., & Seegmuller, T. (2014). Environmental quality, public debt and economic development. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9639-x
Heijdra, B. J., Kooiman, J. P., & Ligthart, J. E. (2006). Environmental quality, the macroeconomy, and intergenerational distribution. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(1), 74–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2005.05.001
Heller, P. S. (2005). Understanding fiscal space. IMF Policy Discussion Paper, 05(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451975635.003.
Hurnik, J., & Sirimaneetham, V. (2003). A Long-term Approach for Analysing Public Debt Sustainability: A Case Study of Mongolia. ESCAP Working Paper Series, WP/23/02. https://repository.unescap.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5a169df0-a60f-49b1-b0b8-0f899853be16/content
Kantorowicz, J., Collewet, M., DiGiuseppe, M., & Vrijburg, H. (2024). How to finance green investments? The role of public debt. Energy Policy, 184, 113899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113899.
Koehler, S., & König, T. (2015). Fiscal governance in the Eurozone: How effectively does the Stability and Growth Pact limit governmental debt in the Euro countries? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.26.
Madaleno, M., & Nogueira, M. C. (2023). How renewable energy and CO2 emissions contribute to economic growth, and sustainability – An extensive analysis. Sustainability, 15(5), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054089.
Mehta, D., & Prajapati, P. (2024). Asymmetric effect of environment tax and spending on CO2 emissions of European Union. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 27416–27431, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32990-y
Meng, F. (2024). Driving sustainable development: Fiscal policy and the promotion of natural resource efficiency. Resources Policy, 90, 104687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104687.
Muszyńska, J. (2006), Modelowanie danych panelowych. Zeszyty Naukowe Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej we Włocławku, 1, 213-236. http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/5101 (in Polish).
Noja, G. G., Cristea, M., Thalassinos, E., & Kadłubek, M. (2021). Interlinkages between government resources management, environmental support, and good public governance: Advanced insights from the European Union. Resources, 10(5), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10050041.
Petkova, N. (2009). Integrating Public Environmental Expenditure within Muti-Year Budgetary Frameworks. OECD Environment Working Papers, 7(1), 1-74, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/224138120533 .
Russel, D., & Benson, D., (2014). Green budgeting in an age of austerity: a transatlantic comparative perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 243-262, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.775727
Sanguino, R., Barroso, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, S., & Sánchez-Hernández, M. I. (2020). Current trends in economy, sustainable development, and energy: A circular economy view. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-019-07074-X.
Shaari, M. S., Masnan, F., Abd Rani, M. J., Zainal Abidin, Z., Ridzuan, A. R., & Othman, N. (2023). The grim cost of economic growth and environmental degradation: A comprehensive panel ARDL study of public debt in the ASEAN-5 countries. Sustainability, 15(14), 10756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410756.
Stojanović, M., Becić, S., & Stojanović, G. (2022). Participation of environmental taxes in government expenditures for environmental protection: The case of selected EU countries. BizInfo (Blace): Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 13(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo2201011S.
Sun, J., Li, P., & Wang, Y. (2024). Policy tools for sustainability: Evaluating the effectiveness of fiscal measures in natural resource efficiency. Resources Policy, 89, 104575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104575.
Tirtayasa, S., Akrim, A., Gunawan, A., Sulasmi, E., & Anisah, H. U. (2021). Significance of economic activities in environmental protection: Evidence from a panel of 4-asean economies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(2), 420-426. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10831.
Uctum, M., & Wickens, M. (2000). Debt and deficit ceilings, and sustainability of fiscal policies: An intertemporal analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00168.
Yang, Q., He, J., Liu, T., & Zhu, Z. (2021). Environmental effects of credit allocation structure and environmental expenditures: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(11), 5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115865.
Young, C. E., & Roncisvalle, C. A. (2002). Expenditures, investment and financing for sustainable development in Brazil. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/5755-expenditures-investment-and-financing-sustainable-development-brazil
Žarković, M., Lakić, S., Ćetković, J., Pejović, B., Redzepagic, S., Vodenska, I., & Vujadinović, R. (2022). Effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, GHG, ICT on sustainable economic growth: Evidence from old and new EU countries. Sustainability, 14(15), 9662. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159662.
Zenios, S. A. (2024). The climate-sovereign debt doom loop: what does the literature suggest? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 67, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101414
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment