Keywords
economic growth
greenhouse gas emissions
environmental kuznets curve
maritime logistics connectivity
How to Cite
Abstract
This study investigates the dynamic relationship between international trade, economic growth, maritime logistics connectivity, urbanisation, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 18 Asian countries over the period 2006–2023. Asia plays a central role in the global economy and contributes a substantial share of worldwide emissions, making it a critical region for understanding trade–environment interactions. Using a dynamic panel data approach, this study employs the System Generalised Method of Moments (System GMM) to address emission persistence and potential endogeneity among variables. The empirical model incorporates real GDP per capita and its squared term to test the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, total merchandise trade as a proxy for trade openness, the Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (LSCI) to capture maritime logistics efficiency, and urbanisation as a structural control variable. The results reveal strong persistence in GHG emissions, indicating path dependency in environmental degradation. Economic growth exhibits a non-linear relationship with emissions, providing empirical support for the EKC hypothesis in the Asian context. International trade openness is found to significantly increase emissions, supporting the pollution haven hypothesis. Importantly, maritime logistics connectivity shows a negative association with GHG emissions, suggesting that improvements in shipping connectivity and logistics efficiency can reduce emission intensity and partially offset the environmental costs of trade expansion. Urbanisation does not display a statistically significant effect on emissions, reflecting heterogeneous urban development patterns across Asian countries. Overall, the findings highlight that achieving a sustainable environmental economy in Asia requires not only managing the scale of economic growth and trade, but also improving its quality through efficient logistics infrastructure, cleaner technologies, and coherent environmental policies. This study provides policy-relevant insights for developing and emerging economies seeking to balance trade integration with climate change mitigation.
References
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Imran, M., Khan, I., Nassani, A. A., Binsaeed, R. H., Abro, M. M. Q., Zaman, K., & Haffar, M. (2023). A green perspective: Investigating the optical effects of e-commerce, renewable energy demand, and services trade on carbon emissions. Optik, 283, 170918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170918
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
International Energy Agency. (2025). World energy outlook 2025. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2025
Islam, S., Toma, L. T., Bhowmik, R. C., Ridwan, M., Hossain, M. E., & Esquivias, M. A. (2025). From ports to power grids: evaluating the environmental implications of shipping activity, electrification, and human capital in G-20 countries. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 34, 101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101719
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
Sikder, M., Wang, C., Rahman, M. M., Yeboah, F. K., Alola, A. A., & Wood, J. (2024). Green logistics and circular economy in alleviating CO2 emissions: Does waste generation and GDP growth matter in EU countries? Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141708
UNCTAD. (2024). Liner shipping connectivity index (LSCI). https://unctadstat.unctad.org/datacentre/dataviewer/US.LSCI
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
Wahab, S., Imran, M., Ahmed, B., Rahim, S., & Hassan, T. (2024). Navigating environmental concerns: Unveiling the role of economic growth, trade, resources and institutional quality on greenhouse gas emissions in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139851
Wang, P., Mao, X., & Huang, X. (2024). How does global trade in environmental goods contribute to the SDGs in developing countries? Sustainable Development, 32(1), 496-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2673
Xu, S., Peng, Y., Yan, K., Han, M., & Zhang, B. (2025). Opportunities to mitigate process-related greenhouse gas emissions in global trade networks. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 57, 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.05.016
Zheng, X., & Lam, K. L. (2024). An overview of environmental co-benefits and trade-offs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in municipal wastewater management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 46, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.002
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment