Keywords
circular supply chains
plastic waste
coercive pressure
recycling barriers
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines regulatory stimulators and economic-managerial barriers to developing circular supply chains for plastics within the circular economy framework. Methodology/approach: Comprehensive literature review, analysis of EU and Polish legal regulations, industry reports, and case study of Zakład Gospodarowania Odpadami Gać sp. z o.o. as a circular supply chain link. Findings: Coercive pressure from EU institutions represents the primary stimulator for circular transformation. Key economic barriers include profitability threshold challenges and high investment risks. Regulatory inconsistency and instability hinder long-term partnership development. Only 10-30% of plastic waste undergoes recycling in Poland, significantly below EU targets. Research limitations: Single case study limits generalizability; dynamic regulatory environment affects findings' currency. Practical implications: Need for stable regulations, continuous waste streams, and specialised recycling infrastructure investments. Social implications: High recycling costs disproportionately burden consumers through increased product prices. Originality/value: Provides comprehensive analysis combining regulatory and economic-managerial perspectives with practical insights from waste management.
References
Act from 13 June 2013. Act on packaging and packaging waste management. Journal of Laws 2013, item 888. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20130000888 (in Polish).
Act from 14 December 2012. Act on waste. Journal of Laws 2013, item 21. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20130000021 (in Polish).
Act from 17 November 2021. Act on the amendment of the Act on Waste and certain other acts. Journal of Laws 2021, item 2151. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20210002151 (in Polish).
Arranz, C. F. A., Sena, V., & Kwong, C. (2022). Institutional pressures as drivers of circular economy in firms: A machine learning approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 355, 131738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131738
Batista, L., Bourlakis, M., Smart, P., & Maull, R. (2018). In search of a circular supply chain archetype – a content-analysis-based literature review. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502
De Angelis, R., Howard, M., & Miemczyk, J. (2018). Supply chain management and the circular economy: Towards the circular supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244
Dembińska, I., & Marzantowicz, Ł. (2022). Rezylientność łańcuchów dostaw w obiegu zamkniętym. In K. Nowicka (Ed.), Gospodarka w obiegu zamkniętym. Łańcuchy dostaw. Część 2 (pp. 29-56). Warszawa: Oficyna SGH. (in Polish).
Directive (EU) 2018/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment, Pub. L. No. 32018L0849, 150 OJ L (2018a). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/849/oj/eng?eliuri=eli%3Adir%3A2018%3A849%3Aoj&locale=pl
Directive (EU) 2018/850 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, Pub. L. No. 32018L0850, 150 OJ L (2018b). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/850/oj/eng
Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, Pub. L. No. 32018L0851, 150 OJ L (2018c). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/851/oj/eng
Directive (EU) 2018/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, Pub. L. No. 32018L0852, 150 OJ L (2018d). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/852/oj/eng
Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment, Pub. L. No. 32019L0904, 155 OJ L (2019). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32019L0904
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, Pub. L. No. 32008L0098, 312 OJ L (2008). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/pl/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2023). Building a circular supply chain. Achieving resilient operations with the circular economy. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-supply-chains
European Commission. (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, Pub. L. No. 52015DC0614. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, Pub. L. No. 52018DC0028. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52018DC0028
European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe, Pub. L. No. 52020DC0098. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020DC0098
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 882-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303
Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., De Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159
Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015
Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: A supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 278-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141
Hina, M., Chauhan, C., Kaur, P., Kraus, S., & Dhir, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: Where we are now, and where we are heading. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049
Joint Research Centre (JRC). (2023). Modelling the impacts of the European Green Deal on material flows and circularity. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Kołakowski, T., & Marcinkowski, J. (2024). Zewnętrzne i wewnętrzne uwarunkowania cyrkularności łańcuchów dostaw. In Ł. Marzantowicz (Ed.), Rezylientność cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw w dobie cyfryzacji (pp. 28–56). Warszawa: Oficyna SGH. (in Polish).
Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Mishra, N., Singh, A., Rana, N. P., Dora, M., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018). Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context. Production Planning & Control, 29(6), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449265
Marcinkowski, J., & Kołakowski, T. (2024). Relacje międzyorganizacyjne a rezylientność cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw. In Ł. Marzantowicz (Ed.), Rezylientność cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw w dobie cyfryzacji (pp. 99–120). Warszawa: Oficyna SGH. (in Polish).
Marzantowicz, Ł. (2024). Rekonfiguracja na rzecz rezylientności cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw. In Ł. Marzantowicz (Ed.), Rezylientność cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw w dobie cyfryzacji (pp. 57–75). Warszawa: Oficyna SGH. (in Polish).
Masi, D., Day, S., & Godsell, J. (2017). Supply Chain Configurations in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 9(9), 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091602
Ministry of Climate and Environment. (2019). Roadmap for transformation towards a circular economy. https://www.gov.pl/attachment/72d8cd08-f296-43f5-af28-21ab2fada40e
Montag, L. (2023). Circular Economy and Supply Chains: Definitions, Conceptualizations, and Research Agenda of the Circular Supply Chain Framework. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(1), 35–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00172-y
Nasir, M. H. A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Koh, S. C. L., & Yamoah, F. (2017). Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008
Nowicka, K. (2024). Cyfryzacja cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw jako odpowiedź na postulat rezylientności. In Ł. Marzantowicz (Ed.), Rezylientność cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw w dobie cyfryzacji (pp. 76–98). Warszawa: Oficyna SGH. (in Polish).
Parker, L. (2018, December 20). Fast facts about plastic pollution. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/plastics-facts-infographics-ocean-pollution
Plastics Europe AISBL. (2024). The Circular Economy for Plastics – A European Analysis. https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/the-circular-economy-for-plastics-a-european-analysis-2024/
Plastics Online. (2023, April 18). Kluczowi recyklerzy tworzyw w Polsce. https://eplastics.pl/wiadomosci/pb/14555-kluczowi-recyklerzy-tworzyw-w-polsce (in Polish).
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC, Pub. L. No. 52022PC0142 (2022a). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022PC0142
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on packaging and packaging waste, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2019/904, and repealing Directive 94/62/EC, Pub. L. No. 52022PC0677 (2022b). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022PC0677
Proposal for a Regulation of The European Parliament and of The Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020 (2020). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/ENVI/AG/2023/01-23/2023-01-18-Batteries-provisional_agreement_EN.pdf
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 concerning batteries and waste batteries, amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Directive 2006/66/EC, Pub. L. No. 32023R1542, 191 OJ L (2023). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj/eng
Sileryte, R., Sabbe, A., Bouzas, V., Meister, K., Wandl, A., & van Timmeren, A. (2022). European Waste Statistics data for a Circular Economy Monitor: Opportunities and limitations from the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 131767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131767
Stumpf, L., Schöggl, J. P., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021). Climbing up the circularity ladder? – A mixed-methods analysis of circular economy in business practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128158
Synthesia Technology. (2025). Recykling poliuretanu i jego wpływ na środowisko. https://blog.synthesia.com/pl/recykling-poliuretanu-i-jego-wp%C5%82yw-na-%C5%9Brodowisko (in Polish).
Szczech-Pietkiewicz, E. (2024). Uwarunkowania gospodarki obiegu zamkniętego (GOZ) w kierunku konfigurowania cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw. In Ł. Marzantowicz (Ed.), Rezylientność cyrkularnych łańcuchów dostaw w dobie cyfryzacji (pp. 10–27). Warszawa: Oficyna SGH. (in Polish).
Takacs, F., Brunner, D., & Frankenberger, K. (2022). Barriers to a circular economy in small- and medium-sized enterprises and their integration in a sustainable strategic management framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 132227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227
The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation. (2025). Communication from the Commision to the European Parliament, The Council, The European and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Pub. L. No. 52025DC0085. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0085
Wegener, J., Piorunek, D., Stehr, C., Jagoda, A., Kiba-Janiak, M., Kołakowski, T., Marcinkowski, J., Zięcina, A., Białas, P., Boermans, D., & Lemiski, D. (2025). Report on “Dialog-based format for implementation with partners in industry, science, administration”. https://circular-foam.eu/Outcomes/Deliverables/_/CIRCULAR%20FOAM_Deliverable%201.5.pdf
Yu, Y., Yazan, D. M., Bhochhibhoya, S., & Volker, L. (2021). Towards Circular Economy through Industrial Symbiosis in the Dutch construction industry: A case of recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126083
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment