Propensity for pro-environmental consumer behaviour: a look through product and demographic characteristics
PDF

Keywords

consumer behavior
product groups
sustainable consumption
propensity for environmental behaviour

How to Cite

Bernat, T. (2026) “Propensity for pro-environmental consumer behaviour: a look through product and demographic characteristics”, Economics and Environment, 96(1), p. 1275. doi:10.34659/eis.2026.96.1.1275.

Abstract

Building Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR) is crucial for mitigating the climatic consequences of the current economic model. CnSR emphasises the ethical aspect of consumer decisions, highlighting their impact not only on individuals but also on society and the environment. The environmental aspect, particularly significant from a sustainable development perspective due to its multidimensionality, will not manifest uniformly in consumer decisions but will be determined by individual consumer propensity, differentiated both in terms of product and demographic dimensions. Our study aimed to identify the relationship between the propensity for pro-environmental consumer behaviour (PECB) and the types of product groups, considering gender, age, and financial situation as differentiating features. The analyses used survey data collected from 1,439 respondents in Poland using the CAWI method. Three indices measuring pro-environmental behaviour propensity were constructed for three product groups: 1. food products (InF); 2. clothing and accessories, and cosmetics (InC); and 3. electronics (InE). Non-parametric tests and logistic regression models were used in the analyses. The study results indicate that PECB differs significantly depending on the types of products purchased. However, depending on the consumer's gender, age, and financial situation, this statement applies only to certain product groups. The research showed that women exhibit a higher PECB across all product groups compared to men, especially regarding clothing and accessories, and cosmetics. With age, PECB increases, particularly for food products. Financial situation is not a statistically significant determinant of consumers' pro-environmental behaviour propensity in any product group. The findings provide insights into PECB regarding various product groups, facilitating the practical implementation of actions aimed at promoting sustainable consumption tailored to consumer behaviour diversity.

PDF

References

Abreu, M. C. S. de, Ferreira, F. N. H., & Silva, J. F. B. A. (2022). To be or not to be sustainable in an emerging market? Conjoint analysis of customers’ behaviour in purchasing denim jeans. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 26(3), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2020-0097

Andretti, B., Vieites, Y., Ramos, G. A., Elmor, L., & Andrade, E. B. (2024). Underestimations of the income-based ecological footprint inequality. Climatic Change, 177(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03719-0

Annunziata, A., Agovino, M., & Mariani, A. (2019). Sustainability of Italian families’ food practices: Mediterranean diet adherence combined with organic and local food consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.155

Arli, D., & Tjiptono, F. (2018). Consumer ethics, religiosity, and consumer social responsibility: Are they related? Social Responsibility Journal, 14(2), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2016-0036

Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K.-P., & Weber, A. (2018). The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category-independent typology. Journal of Business Research, 91, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.022

Berthold, A., Cologna, V., Hardmeier, M., & Siegrist, M. (2023). Drop some money! The influence of income and subjective financial scarcity on pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102149

Borthakur, A., & Singh, P. (2022). Understanding consumers’ perspectives of electronic waste in an emerging economy: A case study of New Delhi, India. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 7(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-022-00242-9

Bürklin, N. (2019). Institutional enhancement of consumer responsibility in fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 23(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-02-2018-0022

Campbell-Arvai, V. (2015). Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours among university undergraduates. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0071

Devinney, T., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G., & Birtchnell, T. (2006). The other CSR: Consumer social responsibility. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Leeds University Business School Working Paper, 15-04 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.901863

Dinh, C. T., Uehara, T., & Tsuge, T. (2021). Green attributes in young consumers’ purchase intentions: A cross-country, cross-product comparative study. Sustainability, 13(17), 9825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179825

ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude–intention–behaviour gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556

Flores, P. J., & Jansson, J. (2022). Determinants of consumer green innovation adoption across domains: A systematic review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1761–1784. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12810

Fox, E. L., Davis, C., Downs, S. M., McLaren, R., & Fanzo, J. (2021). A focused ethnographic study on the role of health and sustainability in food choice decisions. Appetite, 165, 105319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105319

Grimmer, M., & Miles, M. P. (2017). With the best of intentions: A large sample test of the intention–behaviour gap in pro-environmental consumer behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12290

Harms, R., & Linton, J. D. (2016). Willingness to pay for eco-certified refurbished products: The effects of environmental attitudes and knowledge. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(4), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12301

Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., Steen-Olsen, K., Wood, R., Vita, G., Tukker, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2016). Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12371

Joshua, J. (2017). The environmental effects of overconsumption. In J. Joshua (Ed.), The economics of addictive behaviours (pp. 67–73). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62536-2_9

Kemi, A., & Zilahy, G. (2023). Green fashion consumption: A review of the literature. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 32(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppso.21052

Koch, J., Vringer, K., van der Werff, E., Wilting, H., & Steg, L. (2024). Circular consumption to reduce environmental pressure: Potential of behavioural change in the Netherlands. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 44, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.009

Kowalska, A., Ratajczyk, M., Manning, L., Bieniek, M., & Mącik, R. (2021). Young and green: Consumers’ perceptions and purchasing behaviour towards organic food. Sustainability, 13(23), 13022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313022

Limbu, Y. B., & Ahamed, A. (2023). What influences green cosmetics purchase intention and behaviour? Sustainability, 15(15), 11881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511881

Lin, P.-H., & Chen, W.-H. (2022). Factors that influence consumers’ sustainable apparel purchase intention: The moderating effect of generational cohorts. Sustainability, 14(14), 8950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148950

Nguyen, M. T. T., Nguyen, L. H., & Nguyen, H. V. (2019). Materialistic values and green apparel purchase intention among young Vietnamese consumers. Young Consumers, 20(4), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2018-0859

Penz, E., & Drewes, K. L. (2022). What shapes pro-environmental attitudes and intention for sustainable fashion consumption? Sustainability, 14(22), 15331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215331

Quoquab, F., & Mohammad, J. (2020). A review of sustainable consumption (2000–2020): What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1811441

Salimath, M., & Chandna, V. (2018). Sustainable consumption and growth: Examining complementary perspectives. Management Decision, 59(6), 1228-1248. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2016-0934

Scarpato, D., Rotondo, G., & Simeone, M. (2022). Healthy and sustainable food: A cross-cultural study. Foods, 11(13), 1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131941

Sesini, G., Castiglioni, C., & Lozza, E. (2020). New trends and patterns in sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 12(15), 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155935

Skowron, S. (2016). Świadomość ekologiczna klientów i jej pomiar. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 460, 9–18. https://dbc.wroc.pl/Content/36560/PDF/Skowron_Swiadomosc_Ekologiczna_Klientow_i_Jej_Pomiar_2016.pdf (in Polish).

Thukral, S., Shree, D., & Singhal, S. (2023). Consumer behaviour towards storage, disposal and recycling of e-waste: Systematic review and future research prospects. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(3), 1021–1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2021-0774

Vidal-Ayuso, F., Akhmedova, A., & Jaca, C. (2023). The circular economy and consumer behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 137824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137824

Wang, J., Pham, T. L., & Dang, V. T. (2020). Environmental consciousness and organic food purchase intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030850

Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11, 3107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y

Wierzbiński, B., Surmacz, T., Kuźniar, W., & Witek, L. (2021). Ecological awareness and food preferences. Agriculture, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040345

Wijekoon, R., & Sabri, M. (2021). Determinants that influence green product purchase intention. Sustainability, 13(11), 6219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116219

Witek, L., & Kuźniar, W. (2020). Green Purchase Behavior: The Effectiveness of Sociodemographic Variables for Explaining Green Purchases in Emerging Market. Sustainability, 13(1), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010209

Wyrzykowska, B., & Rytko, A. (2024). Green choices: A comprehensive review of pro-environmental consumer behaviours. European Research Studies Journal, 27, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3401

Zhang, X., & Dong, F. (2020). Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186607

Zhuravleva, L. A., Zarubina, E. V., Ruchkin, A. V., Chupina, I. P., & Simachkova, N. N. (2023). Organic food as estimated by young consumers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1206, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1206/1/012005

Gruszczyński, M. (2012). Mikroekonometria: Modele i metody analizy danych indywidualnych (2nd ed.). Wolters Kluwer. (in Polish).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.