Keywords
environmental sustainability
Happy Planet Index
household behaviour
wellbeing
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines the economics of wellbeing and environmental sustainability through the lens of the Happy Planet Index in Indonesian conservation zones. The research addresses the problem of how household-level behaviours and local institutions shape sustainable wellbeing, offering novelty by applying the Happy Planet Index at the micro scale of buffer villages. Using a mixed-methods approach combining household surveys, logistic regression, marginal effect analysis, and qualitative fieldwork, the study finds significant contrasts between Meru Betiri and Baluran. Waste management and access to green space increase the probability of achieving high wellbeing, while high meat consumption and reliance on motorised transport reduce it. Statistical validity is supported by robust model accuracy, while qualitative evidence highlights the role of social norms and community-based conservation. The findings conclude that sustainable wellbeing depends less on geography than on ecological behaviour, providing critical insights for conservation policy and local development strategies.
References
Abdallah, S., & Marks, N. (2023). Happy Planet Index. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 1–5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_1652-2
Acheampong, A. O., & Opoku, E. E. O. (2023). Environmental degradation and economic growth: Investigating linkages and potential pathways. Energy Economics, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106734
Ambrey, C. L., & Daniels, P. (2017). Happiness and footprints: Assessing the relationship between individual well-being and carbon footprints. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 895–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9771-1
Ameyaw, B., & Yao, L. (2018). Analyzing the impact of GDP on CO₂ emissions and forecasting Africa’s total CO₂ emissions with non-assumption driven bidirectional long short-term memory. Sustainability, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093110
Ansari, M. A. (2022). Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112867
Ashafa, S. A., Raimi, L., & Bamiro, N. B. (2025). Catalytic role of Islam’s social well-being and economic justice as determinants of peaceful coexistence: A systematic literature review using PRISMA. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2024-0321
Batchelor, D. (2024). Mitigating environmental degradation: Muslims’ strategic roles for human well-being and planetary stability. TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World, 17(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.56389/tafhim.vol17no2.7
Bell, Z., Scott, S., Visram, S., Rankin, J., Bambra, C., & Heslehurst, N. (2022). Experiences and perceptions of nutritional health and wellbeing amongst food insecure women in Europe: A qualitative meta-ethnography. Social Science & Medicine, 311, 115313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115313
Boadu, K. D. (2015). Exploring economic and social factors that increase economic and well-being measurements of developing and developed countries. Undergraduate Economic Review, 12(1), 1–31. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/uer/vol12/iss1/9/
Bondarchik, J., Jabłońska-Sabuka, M., Linnanen, L., & Kauranne, T. (2016). Improving the objectivity of sustainability indices by a novel approach for combining contrasting effects: Happy Planet Index revisited. Ecological Indicators, 69, 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.049
Casau, M., Ferreira Dias, M., & Leite Mota, G. (2024). Economics, happiness and climate change: Exploring new measures of progress. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05702-2
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. In Ch. N. Poth (Ed.), Handbook of Mixed Methods Research Designs. Sage Publications Ltd (pp. 21–36). https://methods.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/the-sage-handbook-of-mixed-methods-research-design-srm/chpt/2-revisiting-mixed-methods-research-designs-twenty?PageNum=23
Dey, D., Haque, M. S., Islam, M. M., Aishi, U. I., Shammy, S. S., Mayen, M. S. A., Noor, S. T. A., & Uddin, M. J. (2025). The proper application of logistic regression model in complex survey data: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02454-5
Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279411000833
Garcés Velástegui, P. (2020). Humanizing development: Taking stock of Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Problemas Del Desarrollo, 51(203), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2020.203.69586
González-Díaz, R. R., Acevedo-Duque, Á., Salazar-Sepúlveda, G., & Castillo, D. (2021). Contributions of subjective well-being and good living to the contemporary development of the notion of sustainable human development. Sustainability, 13(6), 3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063298
Greene, Z., Henceroth, N., & Jensen, C. B. (2021). The cost of coalition compromise: The electoral effects of holding salient portfolios. Party Politics, 27(4), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820904429
Gürsakal, S., & Murat, D. (2018). Statistically positioning of countries in the context of Happy Planet Index data. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(4), 2497–2510. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil
Hidayah, N., Wahyuningrum, D., Kamara, I., & Rahmah, J. (2023). Determinants of green GDP in ASEAN-5 countries. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 24, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v24i2.22488
Kwon, O.-H., Hong, I., Yang, J., Wohn, D. Y., Jung, W.-S., & Cha, M. (2021). Urban green space and happiness in developed countries. EPJ Data Science, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00278-7
Manta, E. M., Geambasu, C. M., & Davidescu, A. A. (2024). Redefining sustainability: The role of a Happy Planet Index in enhancing SDG. In S., Gupta, S., Taneja, E., Ozen, K., Sood, & S. Grima (Eds.), Green Management: A New Paradigm in the World of Business. Emerald Publishing Limited (pp. 285–302).
Marian, Z., Rodica-Manuela, G., & Florentina, V. C. (2023). Happy Planet Index in Europe: A Gini analysis of sustainable development. Annals of “Constantin Brancusi” University of Targu-Jiu. Economy Series/Analele Universităţii “Constantin Brâncuşi” din Târgu-Jiu Seria Economie, 5.
Musikanski, L., Rogers, P., Smith, S., Koldowski, J., & Iriarte, L. (2019). Planet happiness: A proposition to address overtourism and guide responsible tourism, happiness, well-being and sustainability in world heritage sites and beyond. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00037-y
Nazrana, A., & Parikh, A. (2025). Alternative measures to GDP: Happiness and Happy Planet Index. Learnings from Field, 2, 1–13.
Oprea, S.-V., Bâra, A., & Georgescu, I. A. (2024). Assessing the dynamics of ecological footprint in relation to economic and energy factors: A comparative analysis of Finland and Japan. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 16, 11162–11197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02312-1
Ozili, P. K. (2025). Financial inclusion, religiosity and economic welfare in majority Christian, Hindu and Muslim countries. MPRA, 124262. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/124262/
Patrick, R., Henderson-Wilson, C., Lawson, J., Capetola, T., Shaw, A., Davison, M., & Freeman, A. (2022). Planetary health indicators for the local level: Opportunities and challenges in applying the Happy Planet Index in Victoria, Australia. Global Health Promotion, 29(3), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759211038367
Patrick, R., Shaw, A., Freeman, A., Henderson-Wilson, C., Lawson, J., Davison, M., Capetola, T., & Lee, C. K. F. (2019). Human wellbeing and the health of the environment: Local indicators that balance the scales. Social Indicators Research, 146, 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759211038367
Perwithosuci, W., Mafruhah, I., & Gravitiani, E. (2020). The effect of population, GDP, oil consumption, and FDI on CO₂ emissions in ASEAN-5 developing countries. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 4(06). https://ijebmr.com/uploads/pdf/archivepdf/2020/IJEBMR_560.pdf
Robinson, J. (2019). A socio-ecological approach to measure progress for Ontario’s transition to a green economy: The use of the Happy Planet Index. A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto. https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/bitstreams/196ab931-20dc-4124-b167-9e76c7a16952/download. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.005
Rowan, A. N. (2023). World Happiness Report 2023. WellBeing News, 5(3), 1. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/wbn/vol5/iss3/1. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2193847
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom In T. J. Roberts, A. B. Hite, & N. Chorev (Eds.), The Globalization and Development Reader: Perspectives on Development and Global Change. John Wiley & Sons (pp. 525-547).
Sidjabat, F. M., & Apsari, A. (2020). The green GDP implementation in country-based environmental management system: A review. Serambi Engineering, 5(4). https://ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/jse/article/view/2314
Ustaoğlu, M., & Serdengeçti, A. (2025). Happy Planet Index. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Islamic Finance and Economics (pp. 1–4). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.112643
Wackernagel, M., & Lin, D. (2023). Ecological footprint. In N. Wallenhorst & Ch. Wulf (Eds.), Handbook of the Anthropocene: Humans between Heritage and Future. Springer (pp. 585–590). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_93
Wang, M. (2018). A Granger causality analysis between the GDP and CO₂ emissions of major emitters and implications for international climate governance. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 6(1), 1850004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748118500045
Zhang, M., & Wei, X. (2024). Resource efficiency, cultural industry, and green economic growth: A synergistic approach. Resources Policy, 90, 104769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104769
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics and Environment